What
is a worldview? The term is believed to be rather young in terms of American
English. The definition might be as simple as the compound word itself “world”
being the planet Earth which we all reside and “view” the interpretation of
what is seen. Putting the two words together, worldview is simply, how one sees
the world. This does not mean I see tree leaves as light green and you might think
them dark green, this is of grander importance than how we describe chlorophyll
concentration in leaves. Worldview is often in terms of one’s personal
philosophy. Do we view the world as a cosmic accident in which there is no
purpose or reason for life? Or do we view the world as a purposeful place, with
a reason, and perhaps with a greater intelligence?
I
commonly see one of two worldviews lived. The first, people are mere pawns of
the world, at the mercy of an uncaring world and hoping to make it out with
their own idea of happiness sought. The second, people see themselves as the
masters of their world, they think they are in control of what is around them
and they will never approach a greater power for which they must give account. Those
worldviews are polar opposites from each other, as would be expected; for the
middle ground would introduce some form of deism they ought to apply in the
most ineffectual manner. One might recognize the emptiness of existence absent
purpose but they cannot identify the proper filling. The other is lost but
refuses to admit to being lost with pride. They sometimes will go so far that
an admission of being lost is weakness, instead a mask is applied, with enough
practice the mask is real enough and reality is ignored. There is also the rare
occasion which I see a Christian worldview in practice which they see the world
and its inhabitants in completely different terms entirely.
Who
am I to make such observations? Do I claim to know all the answers and all the
wisdom to know that people are lost or too proud to admit their misdirection? Hardly,
I am but one person who recognizes that I too could have defined my life in
that way. Furthermore, do I need all the answers and wisdom to know when
something is wrong? I think God has given us the intuitive knowledge from Romans
1 that we can all know when something is not right, whether we have
exchanged that knowledge for something else is the difference. I can offer only
what knowledge and experience I have and what has been given to me by God. Between
the two sources I can confidently discern when something is as it ought to be. It
is not difficult to know when something is not right, but it can be difficult
to know what is right.
A
worldview differs from a personal philosophy in which people claim what they
believe whereas a worldview is defined by how one lives. Worldview can also be
described as the type of looking glass we see the world. A person with a
Christian worldview ought to see the world far differently than a person with a
naturalistic worldview. I don’t think worldview is a word to replace belief. I
see it as an answer to the compartmentalization of thought that Americans have
popularized. There is thought in terms of science, history and the empirical
disciplines. There is also thought in terms of faith and religion, which for
many are completely severed from the empirical disciplines. I explain this
disconnect deeper in Losing
Our Minds.
I am tempted to think the modern American
word of worldview is closer to what Romans
10:8-10 is actually talking about when it says “believe”. When I have
further cross referenced the context of “believe” in scripture it seems to
imply more than a set of thoughts or mental agreement. I have come to the
conclusion that “believe” as scripture describes must be followed through with
an active lifestyle. In Acts
16:30-34, belief was followed by baptism. The calling for belief is
mentioned in the Great Commission which Christ says,
"Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover." -(Mark 16:16-18).
This passage is perhaps the only time Christ
says to “believe” but it is not left as a mental agreement, it implies action. Being
that I have not exorcised, spoken in tongues, snake handled, or cured the sick
via laying on hands but I am still assured of my relationship with Christ I
believe there is more to what Christ said. I don’t think those are the only
specific actions which are the criteria for being known as a Child of God. I
think the miracles performed by the disciples in Acts through the Holy Spirit
were the manifestation of Christ’s authority. I also point to Matthew
7:22-23 to clarify it is not about works but the real
relationship with Christ.
Worldview tends to affect our thinking in the
realm of faith and politics. It is shocking how closely the two are related but
how far so many try to separate them. Knowing what our looking glass ought to
show us, how do those images match with our political beliefs? Being the
conservative Republican that identify myself with, I cannot escape from the
consistencies and inconsistencies represented by my political affiliation. Ultimately
my political thoughts should be indistinguishable from my religious thoughts. How
that all comes together is for another blog. Here are some topics to consider
that I doubt we have all examined in correlation to our faith.
Should
a Christian support abortion, capital punishment or homosexual marriage? Should
a Christian support a capitalistic society, a communistic society, or
theocratic society? Should a Christian be republican, democrat, or independent?
Should Christians invest in animal rights, saving the ozone, or preserving
endangered species? Should Christians support Affirmative Action, Welfare or Universal
Healthcare? Should Christians attend public schools, be home schooled, or
private schools? Before you answer any of these with a “yes” or “no” in your
head I challenge you to consider how we can support our biased belief via
scripture or how those topics do or do not align themselves with scripture. I
dare not pronounce my preferences as Christian doctrine, nor my view of how
Christians can best approach these issues as the only way we can consistency
live our faith. I do ask which of these provide consistency with the Christian
creeds and which provide direct conflict?
No comments:
Post a Comment