I hope the title kind
of gave it away, but this one is directed towards the fellas. Not to say my female friends ought not to
read this, perhaps it might strike some interesting feedback with the other
fellas you know. I am reading Way of the
Wild Heart currently; the title is one of the catchy phrases that John Eldredge
was expounding upon. This is an excerpt
from the movie Open Range found in Way of the Wild Heart.
"In the saloon, they try to rouse the men of the town to action. One of the local tradesmen says, "It's a shame what this town's come to," to which one of the cowboys replies, "You could do something about it." "What?" The frightened man replies. "We're freighters. Ralph here's a shopkeeper." Then my favorite line: "You're men, ain't ya?"
The author carries on suggesting
that if you are a man you are a fighter.
He also points to biblical examples of population counts which counted
the men and also counted every one of them as a fighting man (Numbers
1). So I have been pondering
these statements over the last few days and was curious about what my battles
are? What do I fight for? I don't know how confrontational I really was
prior to reading this book but I feel a fire being fed inside that I ought to
be clearly fighting for something.
It is suggested this desire is part of
being a man and I think he's right. I
know this doesn't mean I need to re-class into an infantrymen to get up close
and personal when I do happen to go to war.
I make clear that I choose not to fight over stupid things, and when I
sense what I hold dear to be in danger, threat or ridicule, I have no problem
with charging in. I tend to keep most
battles things that are fought in speech and intellect; I don't have the
highest confidence in my physical contact abilities so I do avoid those
confrontations very well. To be honest,
I don't think I have ever been in a fist fight in which I was actually fighting
for something in such a way.
I was pondering writing about the
evils of the entertainment industry hold on men's hearts and minds. I have had to reanalyze those thoughts
altogether. I am frustrated that so many
millions of American men get caught up into sports, to watch and watch for no
seen gain or purpose beyond the entertainment of watching a game. I think some get a personal value out of
knowing who is the best running back or how many touchdowns this player made or
how many yards that player ran. Similar
to how some women find value in themselves by knowing powerful or popular
people, are some men so satisfied or gather their self worth by watching and
knowing sports data?
I love to play sports; anyone ought
to be able to attest I have no issues getting a little contact in sports. I can't stand to watch a game though. Sure I suppose there is much to learn from
watching the professionals play. How far
is too far? Sports, in itself are a
great thing, to go out on a field and play is one of the ways I feel more like
a man. It is the same feeling as when
we've scaled the waterfall on the Guy's camp outs, or kayaking out to the middle
of Hume Lake. The feeling you get after
a long run or march is completed. The
sense of accomplishment, the body is exhausted but the heart is charged and I
feel alive. I did play a good game of
football this afternoon so I got a little bit of that sensation still running
through me.
The connection between the battles
that men ought to fight because we are men and our apparent fixation with sports
is this. We get caught up into watching
and get comfortable with it. I think
this is true of our attitudes of sports and it carries over into the realm of
the battles we should be fighting as men.
Our sense of leadership and rawness that is who and what we were created
to be is stunted by getting close to the battle or the game.
I am reminded by Darrin McWatters'
frustrating "guy's talk" at Hume a few years ago in which he observed
the purpose of the modern male is to be nothing more than comic entertainment. That was the conclusion he came to according
to his observations of the role we have in society. The most
frustrating part of that to Darrin, was that the vast majority of men are
satisfied in that role, or worse believe themselves to be in that role as an
actual purpose. I like to think and
wholeheartedly believe that we are here for more than laughs.
I recall writing a bit about this in
Role of Men, this blog I have a sense of fire inside me. We need to be more active and assault the
forces that assault us. Not looking for a
fight like an angry drunk but be precise about our battles. As men we our appointed to be the leaders, we
need to step forward with the "here am I, send me attitude" and stop
fading in the back hoping we won't be asked to help.
No comments:
Post a Comment